This painting by Hanna
Yata shocks my sensibilities, conjuring up in my imagination bipolar images of
the best of times and the worse, of being and nothingness, of the beginning and
the end.
The Monarch strikes me as an entrancing fantasy of stunning, evocative,
erotic beauty and, at the same time, an apocalyptic nightmare of our
planet’s last gasp, a final brilliant flash of orgasmic pyrotechnics as all
life on earth – each species exquisite and irreplaceable – fades into extinction never to
be seen again – all because of human greed and stupidity.
Yata writes,
"The psychology of how women are portrayed in art and the media are
amplified and exposed in my work. In turn, I’ve reinterpreted my experiences
and how women are portrayed in today’s society to also extend to how it seems
that we as individuals and as a race have objectified, commodified and
exploited women, animals, and nature."
Her paintings are a
striking rebuttal to most American historians who still promote the idea of
“American Exceptionalism," which asserts we are qualitatively
different from – and superior to – other countries and people around the world.
But the reality is, as her
expressionistic paintings show, we are the opposite. Having built our
American Empire on the backs of the oppressed – women, Native Americans,
immigrants, animals, and Mother Nature – is not something for which we
should feel proud.
Where is our shame?
Years ago, I wrote about becoming a vegetarian after
reading Jonathan Foer's book, Eating Animals.[1] In his book,
Foer tells a story about how Kafka was at a Berlin aquarium, after
becoming a vegetarian, when he surprised his friends by turning to talk to the
fish in an illuminated tank, saying: “Now at last I can look at you in
peace, I don’t eat you anymore.” [2]
To Kafka, the fish was
the poster child of oppression because, beyond all others, fish are the
forgotten ones; their very existence beneath notice and unacknowledged. Foer
goes on to say:
“Shame is the work
of memory against forgetting. Shame is what we feel when we almost entirely–yet
not entirely–forget social expectations and our obligations to others in favor
of our immediate gratification. Fish for Kafka must have been the very flesh of
forgetting: their lives are forgotten in a radical manner;” [3]
Evoking that same moral
clarity through her evocative paintings as Kafka did through his essays, Hanna
Yata once again asks us to acknowledge our shame for a lifetime of denial and
forgetting – hopefully before it is too late.
xxx
For those who might be interested: here are some
of my own visions of apocalyptic climate change:
[1] Jonathan Safron Foer, Eating
Animals, Little Brown & Company: New York.
2 comments:
Hi!
Found your blog through the amazing works of Hanna Yata (http://hannahyata.deviantart.com/) and your writing really touches me. The symbol of the neglected fish is indeed very accurate in how we treat the underprivileged and the environment; it also makes me think of the fact that humans evolved from ocean creatures like the fish - yet what are we doing to them now?
Thank you, Hepingsheng,for your insightful comments. The fish truly is a symbol of how we oppress others, not only fellow humans but all other sentient beings; and, as you observe, they are also our brothers and sisters.
I like your blog. Keep doing it. What was it that Goethe said? Something to the effect: "If you can dream, you can do it,"
Jean
Post a Comment