![]() |
| CC Jean Stimmell |
Yes, we might think we’re invincible and capable of doing everything on our own, like John Wayne or James Bond; that is, until we suffer a serious injury, illness, or reach old age. That’s when we develop a little humility and realize we’re not isolated islands, solitary individuals who must rely solely on ourselves to navigate what is hyped as a dog-eat-dog world. At that moment, we see that, at our core, we are all interdependent in the Buddhist sense of the word.
But it takes a lot to wake us up to this fact.. That’s what Mark Taylor attempts to do in a podcast with Sean Illing, basing a discussion of Taylor’s book “After the Human.”1
Why is it so hard for us to acknowledge that we are all interdependent beings, dependent for our survival on Mother Earth? Healthy ecosystems are as critical for us as an oxygen line is for a deep-sea diver. Intellectually, I know this to be true, and occasionally I actually experience feeling that way, one with the universe, after my ego dissolves during meditation.
But, regrettably, upon reentering the hubbub of everyday life, my ego quickly elbows itself back to life, sweet-talking me into eating red meat, not recycling enough, and often buying things on Amazon rather than shopping locally. Once again, I am hypnotically following the yellow brick road of our modern times.
There are numerous reasons why culture has conspired to separate me from nature, a circumstance we find most common in Western societies.
The Bible laid the groundwork by asserting that God gave humankind dominion over the Earth. René Descartes separated the human mind from the physical world. The rise of agriculture and urban centers distanced humans from natural environments. The scientific revolution marked a shift from mystical and spiritual views of nature to a more rational and mechanistic perspective.
Yes, we can make excuses, but still, many of us know better. Yet despite the consequences being severe, we can’t seem to cut the apron strings. It appears to be a quirk of human nature that we only respond to a threat when it’s close upon us, like only reacting to a sabertooth tiger when it’s poised to pounce and sever our jugular.
When the emergency isn’t pressing, we tend to procrastinate by watching the latest Netflix series instead of pondering our own extinction. That’s why Mike Taylor entitled his podcast “What if humans went extinct next Friday?” He is trying to get our attention by upping the ante.
And, oh, the stakes are so high:
Twenty-seven girls and staff recently drowned in an epic flash flood at a Texas camp; once again this summer, we are coughing and wheezing from raging Canadian forest fires. All around the world, we are witnessing unprecedented heat waves, droughts, floods, rising sea levels, and species extinction – at rates 1000-10,000 times greater than the natural, background rate before human interference.2
Taylor concludes, “We know everything we need to know to do what we know we ought to do, and yet we cannot do it, or we seem unable to do it. It's not just because of individuals making poor choices, it's because we've created a culture and a set of incentives and disincentives that push us in the direction that we're going.”3
If he is right that the human race will soon be toast, we should indeed be pondering what happens “After the Human.”
xxx
Photo Credit: A still-life I posed in my backyard
Footnotes:
1 After the Human: A Philosophy for the Future by Mark C. Taylor. Columbia University Press. 2005.
3 podcast referenced above with Mark Taylor



1 comment:
The one thing that Taylor doesn't do is express that the meaning of interdependence is in any sense the same as the Buddhist belief. In fact he states that he is for the most part unfamiliar with Buddhist philosophy.
The doctrine of dependant co-production and its relation to sunyata is discussed as the foundational description of reality, by the Dalai Lama , Thich Nhat Hanh, and DR Jay Garfield, (prof. Buddhist studies, Smith College, Harvard School of Divinity.) According to this doctrine human beings do not have an inherent nature..”Inherence is a relation between a substance and it’s properties, it itself must also be a property. And this sets up the vicious regress, for then inherence must inhere in yet another substance,and that inherence needs yet another substantial basis, and so ad infinitum.
Post a Comment