First Draft: Small is Beautiful

 

From my library

The Concord Monitor recently ran a column about the advantages of “learning to live with less” by Christine Platt who found: “Living more consciously has allowed me to regain control over my finances as well as my sanity. I have also learned to live more sustainably, which benefits me and the environment.”^⁠1

I wrote a column on this same subject a few years ago in the Monitor, in which I concluded: “Rather than looking for the salvation promised us by the capitalistic gods of advertising – only to be slowly crushed under the increasing weight of shoddy and superfluous material goods – wouldn’t it be nice to escape all that and, instead, surround ourselves solely with those few items, in thought and deed, that define the essence of who we are.”

Returning to this topic today triggers fond memories of my old love affair with  “Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered,” a book written in 1973 by E. F. Schumacher – called at the time “a manifesto from a radical countercultural world.”^⁠2 Fortunately – after being first pooh-poohed – and then forgotten for 50 years – his thesis is gaining support that unlimited growth is terrible for average folks and the planet, backed up most recently in the NYT by the lauded economist Herman Daly.^⁠3

Schumacher was a truth-teller like the little kid in the Hans Christian Anderson folktale who was the only one to see that the emperor had no clothes on.  Walter G. Moss has detailed how Schumacher was far ahead of his time:

“Already in the 1950s Schumacher had been warning the world, and especially the United States, of the dangers of an over-reliance on fossil fuels like oil. Not only was he concerned about exhausting non-renewable resources, but he also decried the increasing pollution that accompanied escalating economic growth and consumption. He was concerned with the types of air and water pollution that Rachel Carson wrote about in her 1962 book, Silent Spring…^⁠4”

Schumacher forcefully argued that bigness is impersonal, insensitive, and motivated by a lust for power; “smallness, on the other hand, is free, efficient, creative, enjoyable, and enduring –”^⁠5  in the spirit of local farmers markets today.

He wrote how modern society has reduced employees to anonymous cogs in a colossal machine, sacrificing craft skills and human relationships to the single-minded pursuit of profit.“What Schumacher wanted was a people-centred economics because that would, in his view, enable environmental and human  sustainability.”^⁠6

Can we build such a society? Daly, in that recent NYT interview, was not sure. However, he was positive that unlimited growth was a recipe for disaster. Perhaps, part of the answer, he ventured, involved spiritual improvement. “That gets you into fundamental religious questions: What is the meaning of life? Where did I come from? What’s going to happen when I die? These are questions people used to think of as fundamental. Now they’re marginal, unscientific.”^⁠7

Schumacher’s philosophy also contains a strong spiritual component, suggesting the ultimate aim of life is about gaining wisdom. With regret, he noted, “the traditional wisdom of all peoples in all parts of the world . . . [has] become virtually incomprehensible to modern man.”^⁠8

“He frequently refers to other religions or quotes varied religious thinkers and mystics like Buddha, the Muslim Sufi poet Rumi, Lao-tzu (founder of Taoism), as well as Christians like the medieval Thomas Aquinas and older Western philosophers such as Socrates, Plato [and] Aristotle. He even includes writers like Dante and Shakespeare as outstanding representatives” of traditional wisdom.”^⁠9

Technological fixes will only exacerbate our problems, not solve them unless guided by wisdom. “From an economic point of view,” Schumacher says, “the central concept of wisdom is permanence.” Such endurance comes not from advances in science and technology but from studying Nature, which is “self-balancing, self-adjusting, self-cleansing.” When it comes to uncontrolled growth, the only example in  the natural world is cancer.

The major advantage of a human-sized society is that people matter, according to Schumacher. Conversely, I think much of America’s current discontent and polarization is because too many of us feel invisible and undervalued, lost souls in a mass society that richly rewards the elite while ignoring the human needs of the rest of us.

Luckily, following in Schumacher’s giant footsteps, the degrowth movement is now becoming a force again, unveiling intriguing economic alternatives that could make us ecologically sustainable while, at the same time, giving everyone a chance to live a fulfilling life. (For more on the degrowth movement, see my column from 4/20/22.)^⁠10

xxx

¹ Concord Monitor. 7/20/22. Page A7.

² https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/10/small-is-beautiful-economic-idea

³ https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/07/18/magazine/herman-daly-interview.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220718&instance_id=66989&nl=todaysheadlines®i_id=30753738&segment_id=98897&user_id=273ae8c1ede4fde7d59a2b0627accb92

⁴ “The Wisdom of E. F. Schumacher.” © 2010 by Walter G. Moss

⁵ E. F. Schumacher: Changing the Paradigm of Bigger Is Better by Roli Varma. BULLETIN OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY. P.1

⁶ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/10/small-is-beautiful-economic-idea

⁷ Ibid.

⁸ “A Guide for the  Perplexed” by E. F. Schumacher. Harper & Row. 1977. p. 13

⁹ “The Wisdom of E. F. Schumacher.” © 2010 by Walter G. Moss

¹⁰ http://jeanstimmell.blogspot.com/2022/04/remembering-donella-meadows-on-earth-day.html

We Are All One

A bustling maternity ward of baby stars in space: 

The young, star-forming region in the Carina Nebula captured by 

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope 

NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI

Two recent happenings have blown my socks off. The first was discovering the Mexican American poet Ada Limón. She will be our next Poet Laureate and is vowing to use her position to help our nation “become whole again.”^⁠1

"Dead Stars" is the extraordinary poem that first attracted me to her. At the poem's beginning, the speaker and another person are outdoors, pointing out the stars that makeup Orion's constellation. They talk about learning some new constellations, but more than that, the speaker says, they have forgotten their bodies are made of dead stars:

But mostly we’re forgetting we’re dead stars too, my mouth is full

      of dust and I wish to reclaim the rising—

to lean in the spotlight of streetlight with you, toward

      what’s larger within us, toward how we were born.

Look, we are not unspectacular things.

      We’ve come this far, survived this much. What

would happen if we decided to survive more? To love harder?

What if we stood up with our synapses and flesh and said, No.

     No, to the rising tides.

Ada Limon’s poem is a call for action to shake us out of our postmodern malaise. What if, instead, we stiffened our spines to survive more, love harder, and collectively put our shoulders to the wheel to curb climate change; what “if we launched our demands into the sky, made ourselves so big people could point to us with the arrows.”

My second epiphany, in concert with Ada Limon’s lyric call for action, happened when the new James Webb Space telescope was unveiled. Right on time, choreographed too perfectly to be credible in a novel, science has indeed “launched our demands into the sky!” This all-powerful telescope is a modern-day totem, which, coupled with Limon’s poem, is capable of restoring the mythic, mind-blowing wonder of being alive back into our myopic, soap opera, ad-infected, pedestrian  lives.

Ada Limon is a visionary like the revered astronomer Carl Sagon who was the first to impress upon us that “we are made of star stuff.” (It’s a fact: the matter in our bodies was created in stars at the beginning of time.) Like Limon, “He wanted people to know, we are marvelous, and our story is too.”^⁠2 Furthermore, “Some part of our being knows this is where we came from. We long to return.”  

Telescopes allow us access to that ancient time, the earliest days of our story, to reframe the big questions we’ve been asking about the nature of life. Humans are explorers by nature, and it’s no surprise that we would explore stars, too. As Shannon Stirone has written in the NYT:“For thousands of years humans etched stars on rocks and painted constellations on cave walls. We’ve been looking up, echoing a cosmic gaze that is built into our bones, blood and history.^⁠3”

Inspired explorers of the mind like Carl Jung and Mircea Eliade have long been sensitive to the primal significance of dust and bone. As Eliade has written: "Indeed, for the hunting peoples, the bone symbolizes the ultimate root of animal Life… when they die their "life" is reduced to the essence concentrated in the skeleton, whence they will be born anew according to an uninterrupted cycle…By contemplating himself as a skeleton, the shaman does away with time and stands in the presence of the eternal source of Life."^⁠4 

Now, for the first time, that eternal source has been made visible with the debut of our revolutionary new telescope, capable of looking back 13 billion years, almost to the beginning of time.  It’s virtually impossible not to share Stirone’s sense of awe at what the telescope brings alive:

“galaxies wrap around one another, swinging past and tearing their dusty, star-riddled arms apart in a violent ballet. Stars are born, birthing new solar systems full of planets; galactic glitter sprinkles the screen as if splattered with a cosmic paintbrush. Each speck of light in that image, each swirling swath of color, contains potentially trillions of planets, many of which are like ours.^⁠5

Awash in our discontent from excessive navel-gazing and political posturing, this is a perfect time to step back and share this sacred moment brought into focus by two of our own: a poet and an astronomer. They are confirming what the great mystics have always preached. We should all take a deep breath and soak in the message.

We Are All One.

xxx

¹ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/books/ada-limon-poet-laureate.html

² https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/opinion/nasa-james-webb-space-telescope-awe.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220712&instance_id=66497&nl=todaysheadlines&regi_id=30753738&segment_id=98355&user_id=273ae8c1ede4fde7d59a2b0627accb92

³ Ibid.

⁴ Mircea Eliade’s  book, Myths, Dreams and Mysteries: The Encounter Between Contemporary Faiths and Archaic Realities—see especially his comments on "bones," pp. 83-84.

⁵ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/opinion/nasa-james-webb-space-telescope-awe.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220712&instance_id=66497&nl=todaysheadlines&regi_id=30753738&segment_id=98355&user_id=273ae8c1ede4fde7d59a2b0627accb92

Christianity Out of the Barrel of a Gun

Only the Facade Remains
 St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church in Dover NH being demolished
CC Jean Stimmell: Winter of 2017

Religious beliefs have varied enormously over the centuries around the world, including in the U.S. today, where articles of faith differ radically between individuals. Ordinarily, one could argue this is good: that our breadth of views validates the complexity of the topic, proving, once and for all, the grand and sacred mystery of life.

Having a breadth of views is admirable, but it becomes disastrous when different dominations feel compelled to fight for their beliefs. While the old saying is false that  "More people have died in the name of religion than any other cause on earth," neither is religion an innocent party, as Alain de Botton, a philosopher, has observed: 

“None of this is to excuse the undeniable barbarity unleashed by religionists over the centuries. The misogyny, beheadings, terrorism, killings, beatings and cruelty are real. They continue. Today we see a growing battle in the Middle East between Shi'ite and Sunni; a Jewish state unleashing militancy against Christian and Muslim Palestinians; and an anti-gay crusade led by some Jewish, Christian and Muslim leaders that threatens the sanctity of life itself.”^⁠1

Continuing on this theme, Thomas Merton, the celebrated Trappist  monk, accused Catholics during the Cold War of being infected with worldly values for advocating military force, even threatening using nuclear weapons, to protect their power. He expressed sadness that believers did not take Jesus's non-violent ethics seriously. Merton’s point is relevant to the present moment in more ways than one.^⁠2

A recent NYT article documents how far-right Christian candidates are pursuing power by mixing religious fervor with conspiracy theories, even calling for the end of the separation of church and state.^⁠3  They encourage the violent overthrow of our government, urging citizens to arm themselves for the fight ahead.

A good example is Doug Mastriano, Pennsylvania state senator and a Republican gubernatorial candidate: he is explicitly promoting Christian power in America supported by an armed citizenry. At the opening of a far-right event where he spoke, "A robotic voice-over forecast a 'great awakening,' and an image of a guillotine blade accompanied the promise of 'executions, justice, victory.'"

No talk here about Jesus turning the other cheek.

Another example is extremists in the pro-life movement pushing for “abortion abolition:” “a move to criminalize abortion from conception as homicide, and hold women who have the procedure responsible — a position that in some states could make those women eligible for the death penalty.”^⁠4

What is next: witch trials?

Elizabeth Neuman is a devout Christian raised in the evangelical tradition and a former top official at the Department of Homeland Security. She warns us that such violent extremism is not an aberration but "the troubling-but-natural outgrowth of a strain of American Christianity…having nigh-apocalyptic stakes and a strong authoritarian streak.”^⁠5

Some Christian nationalists are overtly embracing war. A recent book, "Christianity at War, the Manifesto for Christian Militancy," takes it as a badger of honor that Christianity has been at war since the beginning of humanity; the author believes the last battle is now at hand: the final struggle between Christendom and the empire of Anti Christ.

Professor Andrew Whitehead, the lead author of the award-winning book, Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States, writes that Christian nationalism is a political theology that legitimizes the type of violence we saw on Jan. 6, not in service of democracy but instead for fundamentally anti-democratic goals.^⁠6

The latest Supreme Court decisions have further enflamed these conservative religious zealots, causing them to escalate their venomous and violent rhetoric, divorcing them even further from Jesus’s Golden Rule. If nothing else, it proves the old proverb: “Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

xxx

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

¹ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/religion-wars-conflict

² https://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/book-reviews/view/16608/cold-war-letters

³ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/08/us/christian-nationalism-politicians.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220709&instance_id=66233&nl=todaysheadlines&regi_id=30753738&segment_id=98067&user_id=273ae8c1ede4fde7d59a2b0627accb92

⁴ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/01/us/abortion-abolitionists.html

⁵ https://www.politico.com/amp/news/magazine/2021/02/04/qanon-christian-extremism-nationalism-violence-466034

⁶ https://time.com/6052051/anti-democratic-threat-christian-nationalism/

 

The Mystery of Life

 

Seapoint Beach, Kittery ME
CC Jean Stimmell

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about Ayana Elizabeth Johnson, a positive voice raised against today’s doomsday handwringing. Krista Tippett also exudes hope for the future: She has become a leading spiritual voice of our times through her podcasts, interviewing exceptional people “whose insights kindle in us a sense of wonder and courage.”^⁠1 

In her latest book,“Becoming Wise,”^⁠2 she uncovers how wisdom is gained, not by denying the most tragic aspects of our lives but by facing them. Time and time again, she has drawn out stories of folks who have walked through darkness and hardship but “integrated them into wholeness on the other side.” They became not fixed   but “whole and healed,” not despite their trauma, but because “they let it become part of who they are.” 

Hope for Tippett is connected to her unique understanding of theology. While she says optimism is only wishful thinking, hope is a reality- based, spiritual force.“It sees the darkness. It takes that seriously. It sees the possibility for good and redemption. And takes that seriously. And it’s a choice. And it’s also — it’s an action. It’s something you put into practice.”

Redemption is a radical notion for Tippet. Although she doesn’t think humans are innately sinful, it is clear we all screw up. “Every single one of us. And collectively, we’re making massive mistakes.”^⁠3 Despite our flaws, she believes we are all redeemable, relating the example of what Mother Teresa told a group of death row inmates at San Quentin Prison: “If you want to see the face of God, look at the prisoner standing next to you.” Then she adds, “I see the face of God when I look at you.”^⁠4

She believes hope is fostered from practicing rituals within a community. “Hope, like every virtue, is a choice that becomes a habit that becomes spiritual muscle memory. It’s a renewable resource for moving through life as it is, not as we wish it to be.”^⁠5 Modern neuroscience agrees that habits determine who we are: What we practice is who we become. One can become “more patient, being more hopeful, being more compassionate just like it goes for any other skill.” 

Tippett admits it was a turning point for her to discover theology has more to do with humans than god: While psychology can make sense out of part of who we are, only theology and philosophy explore in-depth “ our contradictoriness, and our complexity, and our beauty, and strangeness, and our possibilities.

Sadly, she relates how soaring political rhetoric, which traditionally helped hold us together as a nation, has sunk into a divisive, knife-throwing contest between parties. Generous and inclusive words, what some might call spiritual, have fallen by the wayside: “Peace is strangely divisive. Justice is somehow partisan.^⁠6 “

None of us can know the ultimate truth, Tippet says, quoting the renowned physicist Brian Greene: “The fundamental nature of reality, as far as we can grasp it now is fundamentally hidden from us at this stage in our development as a species.”^⁠7  While we may think our dining room table is made out of 100% solid wood, it is actually 99% empty space in a force-field of spinning atoms, just like our bodies. In other words, we are made up of nothingness. 

Children, Tippet writes, have a natural affinity for exploring this unknown: the inquiry, the enormous curiosity about this universe, and the hope that somehow those answers will come about.” What children and religion have in common is a burning desire to answer these questions. “Mystery is such an important part of it.”^⁠8 

That’s my biggest takeaway from her book: Understanding spiritual practice as a mystery.

We don’t know any more about the big questions in life than our cave-dwelling ancestors. The difference is that the ancients worshipped the mystery of it all while we moderns, the sophisticated ones, deny it. Cutting across the myopia of our increasingly secular society, Tippet looks to theology as the one force that can bring us together on a higher plane, celebrating the holy mystery of life itself.

I will conclude with my own more pagan-like example illustrating the mystery of growing old that I once sent to my mentor, the psychologist Peter Baldwin: “Ah, isn’t life wonderful in its multifaceted mystery, so mind-blowing if we could just let go… fearlessly riding bareback into the sunset on a run-away stallion.”^⁠9

xxx

¹ https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25894085-becoming-wise

² Tippett, Krista. Becoming Wise Deluxe. Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition

³ p 215-216

⁴ p 207-208

⁵ p. 11.

⁶ Ibid. Page 16.

⁷ Ibid. page 183

⁸ Ibid 166

⁹ “A Memoir” by Peter Baldwin. Xlibris, 2017. page 53

How Vietnam got under America’s callused cowboy skin

 

A convoy of cargo boats on the Mekong River in Vietnam
CC Jean Stimmell: June 1966

As a result of America’s war in Vietnam, Thich Nhat Hanh was exiled from his country and ended up a renowned spiritual teacher and peacemaker, instrumental in mellowing our macho culture.  

It was even more of a turnaround for Ocean Vuong, the acclaimed writer and poet: He tells us he literally wouldn’t exist without the Vietnam War. That’s because his grandfather, an American soldier fighting in Vietnam, met his grandmother, “a girl from the rice paddies”^⁠1 and married her. 

And then, there was me: a  hapless 19-year-old who stumbled into Vietnam after dropping out of college. I enlisted before the big Vietnam protests but with major reservations about the war. Yet I had bigger qualms about disappointing my father, a combat veteran of WW II, and my Pittsfield peers, if I did not emulate that manly icon of my generation, John Wayne.

In different ways, all our lives were forged by war – and still are.

Sometimes it takes cultural outsiders to expose our societal blindspots – to show us how things really are. As Vuong reminds us in a podcast with the Native American writer, Tommy Orange,^⁠ “America is literally a product of war, starting with the stolen land we are now standing on.”^⁠2 

This became more evident to Vuong after he started writing: he couldn’t help noticing that even the building blocks of his craft, the words he was using, reflected a war mentality: “I owned that workshop. I killed it, right? I smashed him. I went into that novel guns blazing.” He tells Tommy Orange, "Here we are, our one moment to create something on our own terms, and the only tools we have–we are so deprived as a culture–that the only tools we have is the tools of death.”^⁠⁠3

It seems extreme to say that the instruments of death are all we’ve got. Yet, all we have to do is look around.

We’ve lost, to date, one million of our fellow Americans to Covid, yet congress refuses to approve the money to prepare for the next pandemic – which is sure to come. Climate Catastrophe is descending on us, the ultimate grim reaper, but no one seems to be worried, and Congress seems oblivious. Conversely, our tools of death are ever-ready, always on hair-trigger alert. 

We are witnessing a perfect example right now: when Russia invaded Ukraine, our government was able to rush billions of dollars in military equipment immediately, no questions asked. All of us support Ukraine but shouldn’t equal attention be spent on the tools of life, like massive diplomatic efforts to end the killing.

Sadly, though, war is all we know. 

George Lakoff tells us why in his now classic book, "Metaphors We Live By." He explains that metaphors are fundamental to how we think: we use metaphors to structure what we perceive, how we think, and what we do. In the case of America, he convincingly shows how "war" has become the dominant metaphor of our times.

“It is important to see that we don’t just talk about arguments in terms of war. We can actually win or lose arguments. We see the person we are arguing with as an opponent. We attack his positions and we defend our own. We gain and lose ground…It is in this sense that the ARGUMENT IS WAR metaphor is one that we live by in this culture.”⁠^⁠4

When we look into it, as Ocean Vuong has done, it is frightening how much of our language is based on the war metaphor and its evil twin: our free-market economy with its "survival of the fittest" mentality. 

Carol Pearson, in “Hero Within,” points out the tragic nature of living in an over-ripe warrior society, as we do today: extreme polarization, massive inequality, citizens armed to the teeth, and bodies of mass shootings piling up higher each day. She suggests a more humane approach:

“But what if we simply shift our expectations a bit? What if the goal of life is not to prevail, but simply to learn? Then the end of the story can seem very different; and so can what happens in between birth and death. Heroism is redefined as not only moving mountains but knowing mountains: being fully oneself and seeing without denial, what is, and being open to learning the lessons life offers us.”^⁠5

That’s the life-giving lesson that refugees like Thich Nhat Hanh and Ocean Vuong have brought with them to our shores, and it’s a way of life that I have tried to live up to after my own baptism in war. 

xxx

¹ https://onbeing.org/programs/ocean-vuong-a-life-worthy-of-our-breath-2022/#transcript

² https://www.cityarts.net/event/ocean-vuong/

³ Ibid.

⁴ Lakoff, George & Johnson Mark,Metaphors We Live By. The University  of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1980. P. 4

⁵ The Hero Within by Carol Pearson, pp. 9-10

What If We Get It Right?

 

Ayana Elizabeth Johnson      

I’ve written before about how I’ve been trying to focus on positive alternatives to counteract today’s dominant “the sky is falling” commentary. Today I want to highlight one such encouraging voice: Ayana Elizabeth Johnson. 

She is a marine biologist, policy expert, and author. In a podcast on Krista Tippet’s “On Being”, she points out how we have become demoralized  by doomsday tales about  our future, almost to the  point of surrender. To combat such defeatism, Johnson makes a creative and pragmatic inquiry: What if “we let ourselves be led by what we already know how to do, and by what we have it in us to save?”

In fact, that idea is going to be the title of her next book:“What if we get this right?”^⁠1

Johnson believes our pervasive apprehension has prevented us “from rising to our highest human capacities, in every sphere of our life together.” She says each of us “feels the disarray of the natural world at a cellular level in our bodies.” It’s impossible to divorce ourselves from what is happening. “It’s not even so much that we are in it — we are of it.”

The solution is to stop running from the world we’ve created and turn to face it. Rather than getting emotional, Johnson prefers to put her head down and take concrete action. She reminds us about what we too often forget: we already know how to resolve our climate challenges. It’s just a matter of “figuring out how we can welcome more people into this work, get people excited, [and] help them find where they fit.”

We are already making more progress than we realize.

Just last week, David Brooks desribed in the Monitor the significant gains New England has made: we already have 4,000 MW of solar panels sitting on the region’s rooftops and back yards…more than three times the output of the Seabrook Station nuclear plant. That’s despite major foot-dragging by our retrograde governor and old fogey legislature who, at every turn, have refused to expand renewable energy options.

Wired Magazine has chimed in on the same theme: “The US Can Halve Its Emissions by 2030 – If It Wants To” by Matt Simon.^⁠2 He quotes a new study in the journal Science stating we can eliminate half of the US’s greenhouse gas emissions in the next eight years by fast-tracking solar and wind energy while rolling out more electric vehicles. Success will be less costly because the cost of renewables is plummeting: The price of solar technology has dropped 99% in the past 40 years.

Another advantage will be massive health benefits. The fossil fuel lifecycle, from extraction to processing to burning, is highly harmful to the human body. The study has shown that transitioning to clean energy will avoid over 200,000 premature deaths and over $800 billion to a trillion dollars in health  [costs].^⁠3 

Last, according to energy economist and coauthor Nikit Abhyankar, the cost will not be steep. “In fact, some studies found it might result in significant consumer savings.” For example, while putting solar panels on your roof may be costly, it will save you lots in the long run.

When it comes to combating climate change, Johnson says that we, as individuals, too often give up, overwhelmed by the immensity of the problem combined with guilt at not doing enough.  The answer is to think more collectively. Her favorite quote outlines how an exciting regenerative future is possible, “not when thousands of people do climate justice activism perfectly, but when millions of people do the best they can.”^⁠4

The major stumble block is not inadequate technology or individual failure but foot-dragging by our government. Consequently, at the national level, Republicans have blocked Biden’s Build Back Better program, which would have ramped up the manufacture of renewables, among other climate benefits. 

At the state level, our NH legislature and governor have consistently been the neanderthals of New England, rejecting clean energy bills and regional efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sadly, we are the conspicuous outlier among New England states, otherwise quite proactive on climate change goals.

We need to be more like sports fans. When it dawned on Celtic fans that they had a chance to win the world championship this year, they became energized, rallying behind their team and passionately rooting them on. But in the case of climate change, where we have a clear path to victory, few people seem to give a damn.

Instead, we pay $5/gallon for gasoline instead of driving electric cars; we fight catastrophic forest fires when we shouldn’t have to; and it’s the same story with our unprecedented droughts, floods, and rising oceans. We all know the definition of doing the same old things over again, expecting a different result.

It’s called insanity.

xxx

¹ https://onbeing.org/programs/ayana-elizabeth-johnson-what-if-we-get-this-right/

² https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-can-halve-its-emissions-by-2030-if-it-wants-to/

³ Ibid.

⁴ https://www.vogue.com/article/ayana-elizabeth-johnson-new-climate-podcast

Kindling Extravagant Hope

“In times of change, learners inherit the earth,

 while the learned find themselves 

beautifully equipped to deal with

 a world that no longer exists.” 

– Eric Hoffer

I became a fan of Eric Hoffer after reading his best-selling book "The True Believer." At the time, I was a young man recently back from Vietnam working union construction and going to college when I could afford it. I had a special attraction to Hoffer, a longshoreman from San Francisco because he was a union man like me. I relished how he destroyed the stereotype of an intellectual as some frail creature cloistered in an ivy tower. 

He was the exact opposite: Self-educated and down-to-earth: a blue-collar man of the people. College does an excellent job of training a person on how to color inside the lines, sometimes at the expense of being blind to exciting new worlds that dwell outside those lines. Look at those famous artists who were known for breaking new ground, maybe because they never went to art school: Jean-Michel Basquiat, Frida Kahlo, Vincent Van Gogh come to mind.

Another point of commonality: I do my research in the same unorthodox way as Hoffer did, although I now do it online and in Kindle. From notes I took last century, here's his take on the subject: "I go to the library, I pick up the things that interest me, I use whatever comes my way. And I believe that if you have a good theory, the things you need will come your way. You'll be lucky.”^⁠1 

I'm revisiting "The True Believer" now, a book written over 70 years ago, because his analysis of mass movements is so spot-on: It's uncanny how precisely his thoughts about the nature of fascism, Nazism, and communism after WW II foretell the resurgence of authoritarianism today. To my way of thinking, the power of Hoffer's analysis comes from being a working man, understanding in his gut that at their roots, such movements are not ideological or political but personal and psychological.

Hoffer's book shows why folks are attracted to mass movements, whether it be Nazism or Trumpism: It is when their self-advancement is blocked and they feel devalued by society. For these true believers, Hoffer writes: "Their innermost craving is for a new life—a rebirth—or, failing this, a chance to acquire new elements of pride, confidence, hope, a sense of purpose and worth by an identification with a holy cause. An active mass movement offers them opportunities for both."^⁠2 

Trump supporters complain that white Americans are being replaced by minorities and prevented from moving up in society by an educated elite who look down on them as “deplorables.” Hoffer shows how such grievances breed a “passionate hatred,” which, in a psychological sense, gives meaning to their lives.

“Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both.”^⁠3

Hoffer makes a crucial point about how to move forward, whether we are on the right or the left. “Those who would transform a nation or the world cannot do so by breeding and captaining discontent or by demonstrating the reasonableness and desirability of the intended changes or by coercing people into a new way of life. They must know how to kindle and fan an extravagant hope.”^⁠4

Trump, the ultimate reality show host, promised extravagant hope with his galvanizing rhetoric about Making America Great Again, promising to restore folks – in particular, white men – to a state of maximum potency in a fantasy world that never really existed. Perhaps it was no accident he reportedly kept a copy of Adolf Hitler's speeches by his bedside. Meanwhile, democrats drone on about brain-numbing policy proposals which put people to sleep or drive them to drink.

Liberals need to wake up: We need to proclaim our extravagant hopes for building a better world for us all because, as Hoffer understood “the differences between the conservative and the radical seem to spring mainly from their attitude toward the future. Fear of the future causes us to lean against and cling to the present, while faith in the future renders us receptive to change.”^⁠5

Let’s listen to Eric Hoffer! It’s time to kindle and fan our extravagant hopes to create positive change– before it is too late!

xxx

¹ “The Independent Scholar’s Handbook” by Ronald Gross. Addison Wesley: 1982

² Hoffer, Eric. The True Believer (Perennial Classics) (pp. 12-13). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.

³ Ibid. p. 98

⁴ Ibid. p. 9

⁵ Ibid. p.9