![]() |
| Original photograph by Pete Yeung, used with permission under CC license The above image has been modified by this writer in Photoshop |
Friday, February 7, 2014
The Beatles: Rosetta Stone to the Sixties
Reminiscing about the Beatles
on the anniversary of the Beatles 1st trip to America in 1964
(a version of these memories was published today in the Monitor)
The Beatles arrived in America in 1964 as fellow
mates, brothers from overseas, all of us goofy and naive teenagers, rebounding
from the oppressive angst of the 1950s to swoon over carefree refrains like I Want to Hold Your Hand.
Over time, however, like many baby boomers, the Beatles matured into innovative, multifaceted adults who explored new ideas, became political
active against the Vietnam war, exposed social and gender injustice, brought
sex and drugs out of the closet, and, at their best, became spiritual visionaries
imagining a brighter future for all of us:
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one.
Indeed, what Aaron Copland once said is certainly
true: “When people ask to re-create the
mood of the ‘60s, they will play Beatles music”
––––––––––––––
Yeah, I
was on of those callow, pimple-faced kids in 1964, a stranger in a strange
land, a freshman at Columbia in the middle of New York City, moaning my
recently slain young president along with his vision of Camelot, grinding away
in my dorm room cramming to catch up on all the classics my prep-school cohorts
had long ago read when, one day, I had to come up for air and took a walk
downtown toward Times Square when I heard this singular tune for the first time,
the refrain from I Want to Hold Your Hand,
wafting out onto the street from all the little record store doors along the
way.
Somehow this sweet melody salved my soul like the
first warm breeze of spring. I just knew in my heart it was the beginning of
something good.
XXX
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Apocalypse, Melancholia, and Transcendence
![]() |
| CC Jean Stimmell |
Last Friday
evening, on what happened to be the Chinese New Year, we watched Melancholia directed by the controversial Danish director Lars Von Trier and starring Kirsten Dunst. The
movie had a profound effect on me not only while I was watching it but
afterward: I had vivid dreams about it that night, waking up the next morning
still in dream reality, feeling like Justine, the heroine of the movie,
enveloped in melancholia, barely able to move because of rapidly growing vines
that were wrapping themselves around her body and legs. The sensation was so
disturbing and like nothing I had ever felt that I told Russet I though I might
be having some sort of medical emergency.
But my emergency
wasn’t medical: it was a spiritual!
While some might
attempt to interpret this movie more in terms of a cosmic apocalypse resulting
in the physical destruction of the Planet Earth, the movie is more of a
metaphor about a woman suffering from melancholia (major depression) who has a
spiritual transformation – something that could be describes as a personal
apocalypse.
There is
supporting evidence for my view.
The word
‘apocalypse’ has not always mean destruction, damnation, and the end of the
world. Originally in Greek, it meant “lifting of
the veil" or "revelation"... A disclosure of something hidden
from the majority of mankind in an era dominated by falsehood and
misconception.2
Jungian analysts
consider the process of ‘apocalypse’ very important, viewing the phenomenon as
a fundamental pattern or archetype underlying all human behavior; Jungians
retain aspects of both definitions mentioned above, each of which is perfectly
expressed in the movie:
• The coming
together of energies in a momentous event that moves us toward growth and
increased consciousness
• The shattering
of the world as it has been, followed by its reconstitution3
In fact, the
renowned Jungian analyst, Edward
Edinger, considered the advent of apocalypse to be a necessary ingredient
to successful treatment with his patients: “Every depth analysis is a
mini-apocalypse.”4 Certainly, Melancholia
was a mini-apocalypse for me.
Melancholia initially affected me in a highly-charged, schizophrenic sort of way,
tearing me apart with conflicting emotions of ecstasy (the hypnotic beauty of
the blue rogue planet looming closer and closer but then not crashing into the
earth with an explosion of annihilation but with a gentle erotic merging like
two cells replicating) while – at the same time – of absolute terror (the shattering of my world as I had
always known it).
The effect on my
state of being and emotions was similar in many ways to my first reaction to viewing Hannah Yata’s painting, Monarch. As I wrote at the time:
"This
painting by Hanna Yata shocks my sensibilities, conjuring up in my imagination
bipolar images of the best of times and the worse, of being and nothingness, of
the beginning and the end.
"The Monarch strikes me as
an entrancing fantasy of stunning, evocative, erotic beauty and, at
the same time, an apocalyptic nightmare of our planet’s last gasp, a
final brilliant flash of orgasmic pyrotechnics as all life on earth – each
species exquisite and irreplaceable – fades into extinction never to be seen
again..."5
These wrenching emotions have
subsided over the last week. Now the transformational aspects of Melancholia’s apocalypse are settling
into my marrow, replacing the rushing adrenaline of fear and ecstasy
with a renewed sense of peace and existential
faith.
I feel like Justine, the heroine of
the movie, is a role model in how she overcomes her inertia and finds the faith
to take charge as the blue rogue planet hurtles closer and closer to Earth. She
is not only able to dissuade her loved ones from giving up or killing
themselves but shows them how to build a magic teepee and find safe refuge
inside.
And that, strange as it may seem, is
the core source of my renewed sense of peace and faith: the magic teepee.
Despite what science or religion may claim, the
best refuge of last resort – and ultimately the only one that works – is a sacred canopy each of us must weave from
our own imagination, a symbolic ritual that gives our life – especially in
the face of death – meaning.
XXX
1 The central theme of Stanislav Grof’s book Spiritual Emergency,
is “the idea that some of the dramatic experiences and unusual states of mind
that traditional psychiatry disguises and treats as mental diseases are
actually crises of personal transformation, or ‘spiritual emergencies.’”
2 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.magick/qtDd-ou3C0Y
3 Edinger, Archetype of the Apocalypse; also as discussed in the live
Webinar on1/18/14, At the Brink: What we fear and why http://ashevillejungcenter.org/webinars/w17/
4 Edinger, Archetype of the Apocalypse
5 http://jeanstimmell.blogspot.com/2013/10/our-shame-for-lifetime-of-denial-and.html
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
The Soul of the World
![]() |
| Epiphany in the City: 1/15/11* CC Jean Stimmell |
Eureka!
The
writer in his loft exclaims,
believing
he has birthed a brilliant idea
not
aware he is merely channeling the recesses of his soul
the
collective unconscious of Gaia, our living, breathing Earth
who
has been incubating this truth for ages in the wood beams
and
clay bricks of this converted old mill building,
steeped
in wisdom and soul.
![]() |
| Epiphany in Nature: 1/15/14* CC Jean Stimmell |
Just as beams and
bricks incubate the word until the time is ripe,
So do the sparse
but persevering dead trees cradle these nests
holding them in
sacred trust for the Great Blue Herons
to lay eggs in when
they return in the Spring
birthing yet another truth.
*Amazing synchronicity: These two photographs were taken exactly 3 years apart: January 15th 2011 and January 15th 2014.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
A new telling of the Adam & Eve Myth
![]() |
| The Descent Wetland heron nests at dusk: January 15,2014 CC Jean Stimmell |
To my way
of thinking, the Adam and Eve Myth shares common ground with my first big dream
about the fierce, Buddhist nun passionately grieving her dead baby. This was
transformational to me, igniting an instantaneous paradigm shift, which, among
other things, brought me into therapy: I saw in that instant that the Nun’s visceral,
raw passion and fierce, primal emotion were what is really real, more so than the pale, stale, static image
of Buddha sitting under the Bodhi tree.
And infinitely more really real than the conventional telling of Adam and Eve story – and the conclusions drawn about what it is to be human!
And infinitely more really real than the conventional telling of Adam and Eve story – and the conclusions drawn about what it is to be human!
Here’s
what I mean: In the Jewish, Islamic and Christian religions, Adam and Eve were
created by God to live in his creation and to have a relationship with
him, something like a human getting a dog. Their very names are indicative of their
roles. Adam comes from the Hebrew meaning "man." Eve is from the
Hebrew for "life."
God wanted for Adam and Eve to live with him in his
transcendent life, pure, cerebral, static, unchanging, unemotional–an eternity
of no surprises. He made a deal with them: They could live in the Garden of
Eden, a perfect place with no thorns or weeds, cultivate the garden, name the
animals, and eat of the garden's fruit, everything but the dark fruit from the
tree containing the knowledge of good and evil.
This sounds to me like the master of the house
telling his dog that you can live in my palace and eat the finest food but
don’t ever bite me, piss on the floor, or go outside to have fun chasing the
mail man or fucking the neighborhood bitches. I’m warning you, if your do, you
are out of here! Do you understand!
How boring thought the dog...that’s no fun al all.
No doubt both Adam and Eve felt the same way: You
can’t have yin without yang, you can’t have up without down, you can’t have
heaven without hell, you can’t have the transcendent without the descendent.
[Enter Stage
Right] At that point, the Serpent appears to get the plot moving. She represents by her very shape her connection to the earth and moist mysteries, to emotion, intrigue, betrayals,
and dark passions: the ecstatic,
irrational, imaginal: the Realm of Dionysus.
But
not according to the Bible which claims that the Serpent was not Dionysus but
Satan himself!
Specifically,
the Bible says that Eve was seduced into eating the fruit
by Satan, who then disguised as the Serpent deceived Adam to get him to also
eat the fruit (of course, he was no fool: he damn well knew it was against the rules, but
didn’t have the balls to take the lead, so he let Eve take the Fall.)
Because they disobeyed God by
following Satan’s advice, God expelled Adam and Eve from the garden. How dare
them! What a nerve to place their earthly desires above God’s transcendent
vision. It was very bad! According to
the Bible, it was “through this act that
sin entered the world."
My alternative version is that the
serpent was the voice of the Earth, freeing Adam and Eve from being eternal
captives, programmed robots in a stale, unchanging, transcendental mansion in
the sky. The Serpent sprung them out of dullsville, allowing them, instead, to to
descend into the uncertainty, dread, and wonder of the land of the
living.
XXX
(Biblical facts from http://www.allaboutcreation.org/adam-and-eve.htm)
Sunday, January 5, 2014
Is Shiva casting a spell or dead tree casting shadow?
![]() |
Dead tree casting a shadow in the woods behind our house
or is it Lord Shiva ?
CC Jean Stimmell: January 2014
|
Shiva the Destroyer and Restorer
Heading through the woods from my house to Wild Goose Pond,
Heading through the woods from my house to Wild Goose Pond,
I found myself in the
last light of this sun-shortened, solstice day
drawn toward an
enigmatic shadow cast by the gnarly roots
of an ancient toppled
tree.
The wind rustled paper
dry beech leaves as I approached,
a drum roll in
anticipation for what happened next:
The emergence of Lord
Shiva,
He of many limbs.
He of many limbs.
Shiva, the destroyer,
zapped my brain, erasing all thought
Shiva, the
restorer, rebooted me to my primal state,
reconnecting me to my
body and sense of place,
grounding me in the precious Earth.
It seemed like it was
over with before it started:
I was confused and
couldn’t quite remember,
dazed like after electroshock therapy.
Did something happen or not?
Did something happen or not?
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
The New Year: A madness or a beginning
![]() |
| Sun rising over ocean at Odiorne Point: New Year's Morning 2014 CC Jean Stimmell |
On
this the first day of 2014
The
sun rises over the ocean at Odiorne
glowing like a digital blowtorch,
glowing like a digital blowtorch,
stunning
but surreal,
radiating
neither warmth
nor
juice to cut the gloom:
“A madness or a beginning?” *
“in the dawn confronted Shiva, the cold light
revealed the “mindborn” worlds, as simply that,
I watched them propagated, flowing out,
or, more simply, one mirror reflecting another.
then broke the mirrors, you were no longer in sight
nor any purpose, stared at this new blackness
the mindborn worlds fled, and the mind turned off:
a madness, or a beginning?”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








