Saturday, February 8, 2025

I’ve become Rip Van Winkle

 



The world has changed so much that I feel like I’m living on a different planet from the rural  Yankee town where I grew up in the late 1940s and 1950s.


 To gauge how the U.S. Has changed, I watched a documentary on PBS examining those exact years that featured Walt Disney, who was then building Disneyland to show “America's future.”⁠1 


In terms of predicting new inventions, Walt got a lot of things right: “Disneyland, made up of four "lands," opened in July 1955. One of the four, Tomorrowland, featured rocket rides "to the moon"; the Monsanto House of the Future, made entirely of plastic and displaying cutting-edge kitchen appliances; and a futuristic replica of Los Angeles' emerging freeway system. Tomorrowland was imbued with optimism for the future and confidence in American superiority.”⁠2


Indeed, we accomplished most of those things: We rocketed to the moon but now find ourselves submerged in plastic and choked by highways, cloverleafs, and high-tech gadgets. Paradoxically, despite achieving the future we thought we wanted, we’ve lost our spunk and optimism: in fact, a majority of us now believe our country is heading in the wrong direction.


What the show missed were the cataclysmic changes that erupted between then and now, totally upending our societal norms and former way of life.  Growing up in the early 1950s, I lived in radically different circumstances before the civil rights movement, Vietnam, Woodstock, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and all the other major historical shifts that transpired – all the way up to this week when we swore in our new president who spurns the constitution and pretends he is our king.


Thinking back on it now, I feel like a modern-day Rip Van Wrinkle who fell asleep in third grade and woke up nearly 80 years later living in this strange new land. The last thing I remember was sitting at my desk practicing cursive penmanship at my old Northwood Narrows school, which had two classrooms downstairs and a meeting room upstairs. 


My only reference material was an old set of encyclopedias housed in the local library. The town contracted with a neighborhood farmer to transport us kids who lived on Jenness Pond to school in his old Jeep station wagon that smelled of hay and manure. We didn’t get our first TV until I was in the fourth grade. 


Jenness Pond Road was dirt and often impassible during mud season. When that happened, we had to leave the family car half a mile away from home and walk in. During those times, our ancient neighbor, who we called Tib, would save time by cutting across the ice rather than taking the longer route by land. We were a little afraid of him, thinking he might have magical powers because he never fell through the crumbling, rotten ice and drowned.


After growing up in the sparse simplicity of rural New Hampshire, a significant chunk of what has happened since seems like a bad dream. While we had to practice ridiculous ‘duck and cover’  drills designed to protect us from an imminent Russian nuclear attack that never came, today, we are facing existential dangers on multiple fronts, many of them unimaginable in the 1950s.


The original Rip Van Wrinkle, written by Washington Irving, was a fable about how America was founded. I’m afraid that I am presiding over its unraveling – along with the Earth itself.

xxx


anImage_8.tiff

1 https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/tupperware-future/

2 Ibid.

Can fairytales have Sinister motives?


The election of President Trump made me want to go to bed and pull the covers over my head. Instead, I decided to do something utterly unpolitical by turning to fairytales, in particular, the work of Marie-Louise von Franz. She was a Swiss psychologist and a leading collaborator of Carl Jung, who specialized in the psychological interpretation of fairy tales. She argued that these stories are parables about how the unconscious mind interprets reality.


Of course, I understood the danger of immersing myself in the enigmatic world of fairy tales because one never knows what will happen. I might get the opposite of what I expected, and that’s precisely what happened after I read a chilling piece about fairytales by Scott Harshbarger.


 He critiqued the fairytale Hansel and Gretel⁠1 in the journal “Narrative, Social Neuroscience,”⁠2   pointing out that the original story had a long history in German folklore before it was written down and published by the Brothers Grimm in 1812. He then gave his take on the plot.


The story takes place during a great famine. A woodcutter and his abusive wife banish their two children, abandoning them in the deep woods because they couldn’t afford to feed them. Without the children to care for, the parents selfishly think they will now have a better chance of survival. The wicked witch comes across Hansel and Gretel and lures the starving children into her gingerbread hut with a candy roof. However, instead of being a good Samaritan, she is salivating over the prospect of eating them. 


The point of  Grimm’s fairytale is to portray the witch as the enemy. Thus, when she burns in horrible agony after Gretel pushes her into the oven, "everyone lives happily forever after." 


According to Harshbarger, Grimm's fairytales like Hansel and Gretel acted to promote German nationalism by switching attention from the Kaiser's ruthless treatment of his people to a more fundamental evil.


That evil, in the eyes of that patriarchy, were women they couldn’t control.  The men were afraid of their mysterious powers rooted in nature, including, they claimed, their secret ability to turn into witches.


This scapegoating of women quickly escalated to deadly violence, resulting in the execution of thousands of women.  Modern scholars estimate that between 35,000 and 60,000 women were burned at the stake between the 15th and 17th centuries, the most being in Germany. The typical witch was the wife of an agricultural laborer "well known for a quarrelsome and aggressive nature."⁠3 (Note: Don’t forget we burned witches in America, too. Remember the Salem witch trials?)


In a particular type of fairytale, there must be a villain, and that’s the kind Trump has propagated his whole career. The only question is, who will be the scapegoat in his new administration?


It’s unlikely Trump will launch witch-trial persecutions against women because that would likely backfire. In spite of that, he has waged a long-standing vendetta against women who dare challenge him, like belittling debate moderator Megyn Kelly with this unbelievable misogynistic slur: “You know, you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”⁠4 


But the ultimate villain in Trump’s nationalistic fairytale will most likely be immigrants, who he calls an invading army of illegal aliens: rapists and murderers from "shithole" countries. 


He will make immigrants his scapegoat to divert our attention from his authoritarian push for total power. If he pulls this off, he will destroy our democracy while ripping away the safety net from regular folks everywhere. The only beneficiaries will be Trump and his autocratic buddies.


America has to be careful about blaming innocent groups for the sins of others.: Look at what happened when a German Nationalist named Hitler started scapegoating the Jews.

xxx


Illustration from Showbiz CheatSheet: https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/gretel-hansel-why-isnt-there-a-gingerbread-house-in-the-movie.html/


anImage_5.tiff

1 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.47.4.490

2 Vol. 47, No. 4, Narrative, Social Neuroscience, Plus Essays on Hecht's Poetry, Hardy's Fiction, and Kathy Acker (Winter 2013), pp. 490-508

3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_hunt#:~:text=Modern%20scholarly%20estimates%20place%20the,in%20European%20society%2C%20although%20in

4 https://time.com/3989652/donald-trump-megyn-kelly-blood-wherever/